Saturday 28 February 2015

Cross media convergence and synergy are vital processes in the successful marketing of media to audiences “to what extent do you agree with this statement (50 Marks)

Media convergence is the combination of two or more media platforms; it can happen in any of the three stages (production, distribution and exhibition), for example using a movie to promote its merchandise eg “Battleship”. Synergy on the other hand is the simultaneous release of different products, in the hope that they promote one another. It describes the promotion and sales of a product or media text through numerous subsidiaries one common option is social media as trailers can appear on blogs and websites such as Facebook. Due to the increase in technology, especially in the film industry, it has become easier for different companies to work together to
create a successful product or brand, therefore I believe cross-media convergence and synergy are important (but not a vital) processes in the marketing of a product and I shall further explain the reason why in this response.

Cross media convergence and synergy are important marketing practices necessary for the front loading of film marketing campaigns. Pioneered by Walt Disney, allowing other subsidiaries the right to use his famous Mickey Mouse character to promote products and gain profit. These rights enabled him to advertise all Disney films and thus help to increase the films sales. By using synergetic techniques Walt was able to build a whole franchise and multimillion dollar theme park in California and then expanded across the globe. Not only did he make profit but he enticed his target audience children at the same time by using the hypodermic syringe model.

I believe that cross media convergence and synergy can help any media product in the promotion stage, however I believe to an extent that it depends on the budget of the piece and how much capital will go towards this marketing process. A prime example of this is The Hobbit: Desolation of Smaug, due to th
e pre-existing fan base of the successful Lord of The Rings Trilogy it was no shock that The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug made a profit of $134.1 million. It is the fourth highest-grossing 2013 film and the 24th highest-grossing film of all time. It grossed $209 million worldwide on its opening weekend. This returning fan base meant that The Desolation of Smaug was in first place at the box office for three consecutive weekends during winter. As The Hobbit is made and produced by a media giant Time Warner’s subsidiaries whereas 12 Year’s A Slave is seen to be made and produced through film4 © a smaller media firm however it was actually produced by Regency Films a subsidiary of Fox Searchlight. As Time Warner is a media conglomerate it was able to successfully advertise through the synergetic system. It is apparent that The Hobbit: Desolation of Smaug’s budget was at $250 million whereas 12 Year’s A Slave’s budget was at $22 million; this clearly highlights the difference between the big six and smaller media firms. The convergence from these big six conglomerates allows them to use wider ranges of synergy which cost higher fees for example: video games, play figures and soundtracks. All these objects attract children.

As Time Warner has a greater market share of 26.3% it is a powerhouse within the media conglomerates beating competition in Disney and Paramount. However 12 Year’s A Slave had to have numerous companies offer capital and investments to even advertise through traditional methods such as bill boards and within small cinema companies. They had less synergetic strategies displayed as it was only expected to premier in art houses and small cinemas, despite this it managed to gross $56 million highlighting how synergy isn’t always needed to promote films, word of mouth is just as successful.

Through the use of social media Time warner was able to successfully advertise The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug trailer therefore enticing the target audience to watch the film as well as informing them of the opening weekend date. As the film production seemed so massive, Tolkien Estate gave permission for the original book of The Hobbit to be remastered but only the front cover as this advertised the new cinema release as on all the new books it stated “in cinemas soon.” Moreover as the book cover had been remastered an audiobook was produced therefore allowing fanatics to remind themselves of the storyline before actually watching the film. This allowed the Tolkien Estate to gain revenue as well as advertise the cinematic release. The fact that The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug was filmed in New Zealand meant that the population of 4.5 million had a special connection with the film therefore creating more of a response. The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug was on every poster and every billboard in every major city trying to attract as many people as possible. As the movie was ‘coming soon’ this attracted more customers but mainly due to the fact that it was the second of a trilogy. The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug was an expected huge success due to the pre-existing fan base however this expectation was capitalised upon as opening night meant cinemas were packed resulting in a $73.5 million turnover in the first weekend therefore displaying how synergy is a huge player within the business, this is highlighted as Twelve years a slave which did not use as much synergy only made $ 187.7 million all together whereas The Hobbit made almost 1/3 of that on opening night.

It is apparent how desperate 12 Year’s A Slave was as it struggled to despatch the release of their film as it took four distribution companies whereas the Hobbit only used one. However the unexpected happened as During its opening limited release in the United States, 12 Years a Slave debute
d with a weekend total of $923,715 on 19 screens for a $48,617 per-screen average. The following weekend, the film entered the top ten after expanding to 123 theatres and grossing an additional $2.1 million. It continued to improve into its third weekend, grossing $4.6 million at 410 locations. The film release was expanded to over 1,100 locations on November 8, 2013.

Therefore synergy is not needed for small companies as Twelve years a slave shows as it was a success despite the use of major synergy.

Monday 23 February 2015

Genre Box Office results 2012




This is the box office results of 2012 displaying that Horror has a high number of releases and grosses about £62,000,000

Thursday 12 February 2015

Fake Injuries and Specialised Wound Kits

We spent time before filming ensuring that we were equipped in the skill of make up, fortunately on of our group took really well to it; Luke, therefore he received the title of make up artist. Its a really tricky skill to create the correct gradient which matches with the skin and Luke did it really well taking into account that the tools we were using were very basic: Vaseline, Make-up and Thinned Clay.


Kirsty Wardrobe and Make up

We decided to go with the classic white ghost like gown, and splatter with fake blood which was red food dye and Tomato Ketchup, it looked very effective, the only problem was because it was liquid we were dealing with it wouldn't have dried for about 10 minute so we had to use a hairdryer. this looked all well and good however for Kirsty is wasn't very comfortable as it was quite cold out and the costume wasn't very warm. She looked really creepy as we purposely put her hair in strewed side pony tails. She also put eye liner and a dark foundation around her eyes to give a demonic topping to her costume.

Tuesday 3 February 2015

Film Postponed Again

Unfortunately we are unable to film today as Kirsty is unwell, I tried to motivate her to go into school so that we could film later as other groups are beginning to build up steam in their filming and we keep stumbling. Unfortunately my mum overruled as it would be unfair to here to film and wait in the cold while she is ill. I have spoken to here and she thinks she will be well enough to film in Thursday.  

Broadchurch Season 1 Review

Broadchurch is a small town riddled in a murder mystery; many people may see this as another "who done it" crime drama, however it has dark secrets hidden within the ever evolving plot. 

Broadchurch is  the town itself. Its natural beauty of the everlasting Jurassic coastline juxtaposes with the ghastly crime and investigation that takes place by its shores. The people that populate the majestic area now have a dark incident they need to solve. 


broadchurch full series review beth Broadchurch Season 1 Review: Is This the Best Murder Mystery Since Twin Peaks?
We feel the Latimer's pain as they have to deal with the death of their 11-year-old son, Danny. The mother, Beth (Jodie Whittaker), is the first to realise the horror, losing control as she spots a familiar pair of trainers peaking out from underneath the pall that covers her son’s body on the beach. Danny's father, Mark Latimer (Andrew Buchan) is stoic and strong for his wife and daughter when talking to the police, but in the morgue, he is a gentle quiver as he talks to Danny one last time, telling him, “I love you zillions, superstar.” The intimacy that circles the family is well-scripted and impeccably delivered. It is difficult to imagine that Mark Latimer the mourning father could ever be a suspect or an adulterer, but then, when he is suspected and we find out that he lied to the police (DI Hardy and Miller)about his alibi, you can’t imagine that Danny’s murderer could be anyone else. This is an intriguing echo recurring over and over again; some viewers may think there are tow many suspects however if you are investigating a death of a young boy you have to get it right! Some of the suspects seem incomprehensible however once the truth is told no one is what they seemed: The Vicar (Arthur Darvill), Mark’s friend Nigel (Joe Sims), the owner of the local newspaper stand Jack Marshall (David Bradley), and others throughout the 8-episode run, as the search for the killer begins heighten the paranoid detectives inside us all.

Season 1 
4.7/ 5

Creator - Chris Chibnall
Actors Below 


David Tennant...
 Alec Hardy (13 episodes, 2013-2015)
Olivia Colman...
 Ellie Miller (13 episodes, 2013-2015)
Jodie Whittaker...
 Beth Latimer (13 episodes, 2013-2015)
Andrew Buchan...
 Mark Latimer (13 episodes, 2013-2015)